🔗 Share this article

A Danish citizen has been found guilty of sharing nude scenes from copyrighted films and TV series on the social media platform Reddit.

According to a law enforcement report obtained by media outlets, the unnamed individual posted 347 clips of nude content in a subreddit he moderated, which were then watched 4.2 million times.

The country's authorities confirm he has been given a seven-month deferred sentence for violating copyright laws.

Legal analysts explain the man was charged under a rarely-used clause in Denmark's copyright law, with the judge ruling that by taking the scenes out of their intended setting, the accused had damaged the performers' "ethical entitlements".

He has additionally been convicted of distributing more than 25 TB of copyrighted digital content.

From spring 2022 to mid-2023, the user known as "KlammereFyr" on Reddit posted sexually explicit clips including over 100 female performers.

He distributed them in the forum he was a administrator of.

According to the Denmark's copyright protection organization the Rights Alliance, his online community had more than 6,000 members and participants were prompted to ask for excerpts of particular performers.

In last year, campaigners filed the incident to the authorities on behalf of the impacted actors, filmmakers and producers, which led to the subreddit being closed down.

One actress, among the actresses whose explicit scenes were circulated in the group, told local media at the period she felt there was a distinction between being seen unclothed in a movie and appearing on Reddit.

The performer said the uploads constituted "exploitation".

'A significant signal'

The defendant was detained in fall 2024 and admitted guilty to the charges last month.

In a statement after the ruling, TRA head Maria Fredenslund remarked the decision sent an "important" message "indicating violations of creators' rights has repercussions".

The ruling is viewed as unprecedented in the country for its application of the "ethical protections" clause of the Danish Copyright Act, which specifies an creator's work cannot be utilized in a manner which violates their standing.

Intellectual property specialist a legal scholar informed the media the case was "rare" for its emphasis on the harm to the dignity of an performer, rather than to them financially.

The extent to which the ruling could affect other countries is uncertain.

But she added there may be "more and more of such cases" in the coming years with the growth of AI, where "the sanctity of one's work might be compromised with greater ease".